

|
This article is the second in a two-part series dealing with “people problems” on projects. In using the phrase “people problems,” we refer to various social and cultural barriers managers face on projects, such as resistance to change, departmental “silos,” lack of cooperation and teamwork, inadequate communication, lack of leadership support, and politics and infighting. These types of problems often present the most daunting obstacles to project success. In our first article, we offered eleven practical preventive actions that the project manager may carry out during the planning phase of a project to avoid or at least mitigate the impact of these types of problems. (Click here to view our original article) In this companion article we present options you can consider if “people problems” occur during the project and begin to impact negatively your progress, despite your best efforts to prevent them. Part II: Intervention ToolsIf “people problems” occur once a project is underway, there are seven specific intervention tools that have been used to get a project back on track. These are:
The type of intervention tool used depends on the nature and severity of the people problems that threaten project success. Each of these seven tools is explained below.
Tool 1: Guide for Personal Coaching
|
|
Back to February Index for
Impact: Proven Concepts for High Performance |
|
Click
here to see an index of all articles
|
| Home | Teamwork | Project Management | Leadership Development | Who We Are | Our Speakers | Our People | Our Clients | Our Products & Training Courses | Articles | What's New |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intervention
Tool 2: Project Personnel Replacement
|
Tool Name |
Project
Personnel Replacement |
|
When to Use |
When the actions (or inactions), poor attitudes, or lack of ability of
a particular project member is causing problems that threaten project
success and several attempts to change the behavior have been
successful. |
|
Purpose |
Remove someone from a project role so that the project team can
quickly get over the problem and move forward. |
|
Process Steps |
There are four factors that must be considered before taking this type of drastic action:
|
|
Time Investment |
Varies depending on situation |
Tool Name |
Outside Facilitation |
|
When to Use |
When the project is in jeopardy due to politics, lack of teamwork, or
other “people” problems and when several attempts to deal with these
issues have failed.
|
|
|
Use an experienced third party, with no connections to the organization, to serve as an arbitrator and facilitator to help overcome barriers and move the project forward. This is a form of a “project rescue” where the emphasis is solely on people problems. Using an outside facilitator is a fairly extreme remedy and should only be used with the most critical projects.
An outside facilitator may be used to help a single
project team, or the facilitator may be used to help the project
implementation team, steering team, or other critical project group
that is not making progress due to leadership, politics, teamwork, or
resistance to change issues. |
|
|
The approach used will vary depending on the abilities and style of the facilitator. The steps below outline a possible series of intervention steps:
|
|
|
Varies with the type of problem faced and the type of intervention
recommended by the facilitator. |
Tool Name |
Personality-Based Teambuilding Session |
|
When to Use |
When a project team or sub-team is not performing well due to
personality conflicts on the team. |
|
Purpose |
Help team members better understand each other, and thus learn how to
work more effectively together. |
|
Rationale |
Many “personality conflicts” result from differences in how team members perceive, make decisions and interpret and react to the same set of stimuli. Once these differences are understood, the team learns that many “personality conflicts” are due to misunderstandings and “projections” of motives that are not necessarily valid. They then can agree on codes of conduct for communicating and working together more effectively.
In
addition to the above, the process of carrying out this intervention
in a retreat setting often helps generate camaraderie and team
spirit. |
| Process Steps |
|
| Time Investment |
Minimum is a half-day workshop; however, for best results a one-day
workshop is recommended. |
| Resources |
Click here to read a past
article with more detailed information about teambuilding sessions. |
Tool Name |
Activity-Based Teambuilding Session |
|
When to Use |
When a project team is not performing well together due to any number of different symptoms (lack of trust, poor communication, lack of teamwork, etc.). Also can be used when a team is in a “rut” and would like an experience to help “energize” or reinvigorate the team. Can also be used as an occasion to simply have fun together to improve morale. |
|
Purpose |
Help team members learn how to work together in a series of challenging outdoor group tasks and exercises. |
|
Rationale |
Lessons learned in experiential outdoor group tasks can then be
transferred to the work setting to improve everyday team performance.
|
|
Types of Exercises |
Activity-based teambuilding can be carried out in a variety of settings, such as “high” ropes courses, “low” ropes courses or an outdoor adventure such as white water rafting, mountain climbing, or even a survival course or boot camp. All these exercises require groups to learn to work together to achieve success. |
|
Note |
It is important to custom design the experiential exercises around specific development needs of teams, such as group problem solving, risk-taking, trust, or paradigm breaking. |
| Time Investment |
These exercises can range from four to eight hours for a typical
“ropes” course to two or more days for outdoor adventures. |
| Resources |
Click here to read a past
article with more detailed information about teambuilding sessions. |
Tool Name |
Skills-Based Teambuilding Session |
|
When to Use |
When a project team is not performing well together due to a lack of
understanding of how teams operate and/or a lack of teamwork skills. |
|
Purpose |
Teach team members specific teamwork skills and ground rules for
operating more effectively together. |
|
Rationale |
The underlying philosophy with the skill-building approach is that the
most likely reason groups don’t work together well as a team is
because they do not have the necessary skills. Thus, the obvious
first step in building better teams is to have teams practice using
teamwork skills in facilitated workshop settings, increasing the
likelihood they will use these skills in the actual work setting.
|
|
Approach |
In skills-based teambuilding, team members participate in workshop sessions that require them to learn and practice specific teamwork skills (e.g., dealing with conflict, reaching group consensus, learning how to give criticism, or running effective team meetings). These workshops include skills that can be applied immediately in the workplace.
The teambuilding aspect of this approach is maximized when intact
teams participate together and make commitments to use these new tools
to improve the way the team functions. |
| Time Investment |
The amount of time invested varies with the number of skills that need
to be learned and the maturity level of the team. For example, team
meeting skills and group decision-making and group consensus tools can
be taught in a half-day workshop. Critical interpersonal skills such
as giving and receiving feedback, dealing with criticism and conflict,
listening, and teamwork styles can be taught in a two to three-day
workshops. Group problem solving tools usually can be taught in one
to two days. |
| Resources |
Click here to read a past
article with more detailed information about teambuilding sessions. |
|
Tool Name |
Problem Solving-Based Teambuilding Session |
||||||||||||||||
|
When to Use |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Purpose |
Remove the team from its everyday setting and get the team to agree on
the barriers they are having, analyze why, and then take ownership in
the problems by agreeing on actions they will take to get back on
track. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Process Steps |
During a one or two-day retreat, facilitate the team through the following steps:
|
||||||||||||||||
| Time Investment |
One or two-day retreat |
||||||||||||||||
| Resources |
Click here to read a past
article with more detailed information about teambuilding sessions. |