|
You
are worried about Joe. When he was promoted from technician to manager, he fit in
well and his employees loved him. Now
that he has been promoted to an executive within his division, he is
experiencing difficulties: he is having problems thinking strategically
and anticipating problems. You
are feeling frustrated because although Joe has attended training
courses on those topics, they have been able to help him with his challenges.
You need Joe to succeed because the company has made a major
investment in him in the past 10 years and you believe the knowledge and
experience he brings to the table are invaluable.
Would Joe benefit from a professional coach?
In
today’s competitive marketplace, retention of key employees is
critical.
Occasionally, those vital employees run into challenges that
prevent them from being as effective as they could be.
This doesn’t mean we always cut the cord and let the employees
go.
It is oftentimes a better investment to help employees through
their challenging situations.
This article explores the value of coaching and how to decide if
you have an employee that will benefit from one-on-one coaching.
What is
Professional Coaching?
While informal
coaching- or mentoring programs- have been present in most organizations
for quite a while, the practice of hiring an outside professional to
coach an individual on a one-on-one basis is a fairly recent
development. This type of
coaching has become more popular as organizations realize that becoming
a leader is not second nature-- principles must be taught and skills must
be honed. Many times,
the higher up you go in any organization, the more difficult it is to
find training programs that are cost-effective and address the
employee’s specific challenges. This
is why many organizations have turned to individualized coaching.
There
are several types of professional coaching an employee may require.
 |
Intervention
for Corrective Action.
Provides targeted help and support
for a leader facing a “must change” or critical turn-around
situation. |
 |
Specific
Skill or Leadership Style Improvement.
Helps a leader develop a particular
skill set or address a particular problem or situation. |
 |
Preparation
for Specific Assignments.
Helps prepare a leader for a new
assignment or a change in job status. |
 |
Continuous
Education and Professional Development.
Extends over a longer period
of time and helps the leader continually focus on the key critical
factors that affect bottom-line results. |
Following
are a few environmental factors that could indicate to you that one of
your employees may need the assistance of a coach:
 |
Declining
Business Indicators. These
could include a decline in production, safety, quality, profit or
other key business measures. |
 |
Negative
Influence. Leaders
can exhibit behaviors that negatively influence the
organization’s culture, evidenced by such factors as worsening
employee morale, high employee turnover, lower production or other
negative factors. |
 |
Leader
Lacks Necessary Skills.
Leaders may need to upgrade their skills to support the
organization’s values, goals and customer expectations. |
 |
Need
for Positive Environment.
Leaders need to create a positive environment and culture
that encourages job ownership and self-motivation. |
The Value
of Coaching
One-on-one professional coaching is
intense and often-times expensive, but it produces results that in most
cases far exceed the investment. A
recent study by Manchester, Inc., a career management consulting firm
out of Jacksonville Florida, entitled “Executive Coaching Yields
Return on Investment” found that a company’s investment in providing
coaching to its executives realized an average return on investment of
almost six times the cost of the coaching.
This
study found that the benefits to companies that provided coaching to
executives were improvements in:
-
Productivity
(48%)
-
Quality (48%)
-
Organizational
Strength (48%)
-
Customer
Service (39%)
-
Reducing
Customer Complaints (34%)
-
Retaining
Executives who Received Coaching (32%)
-
Cost
Reductions (23%)
- Bottom-line
profitability (22%)
This
study also found the benefits to the executives who received the
coaching included:
-
Improved
working relationship with direct report (77%)
-
Improved
working relationships with immediate supervisors (71%)
-
Improved
teamwork (67%)
-
Improved
working relationships with peers (63%)
-
Improved job
satisfaction (61%)
-
Improved
conflict reduction (52%)
-
Improved
organizational commitment (44%)
- Improved
working relationships with clients (37%)
Another,
often hard to measure, benefit of the coaching relationship is the
resulting loyalty of the leader to the company providing the coach.
Your organization is in effect furthering the employee’s
professional development by helping the employee improve their
managerial and/or leadership skills.
This greatly increases the likelihood of retaining the employee
and increasing loyalty to your organization.
“The
real difference between success and failure in a corporation can be very
often traced to the question of how well the organization brings out the
great energies and talents of its people.”
–Thomas J. Watson, Jr., former IBM Chief Executive.
Coaching ROI
While most Human Resource Departments value human worth more than cost factors, looking at the financial side of
one-on-one coaching is also important. As a recent
report by the American Society of Training and Development (ASTD) cites “hiring an executive coach can run up to $2,500 a
day. And many coaches
require a three- to six-month commitment.
This financial commitment, combined with a time commitment that
is perhaps even more significant, can make the decision to invest in
this type of one-on-one training critical.” (ASTD’s Executive
Coaching Research Report at http://www.astd.org/CMS/templates/index.html?template_id=1&articleid=21280)
It
may seem at first that you could create a simple mathematical equation to
determine how much has already been invested in the employee and how
much it would cost to replace that employee versus how much it costs to
coach the employee.
However, when considering hiring a coach for middle to
upper-management or executives, there are many intangible items that
need to be considered as well.
The following list of questions can help you determine if you
have an employee worth the investment of coaching:
 |
Will
the employee's position enable him or her to leverage the coaching
success to other parts of the organization? |
 |
Does the
employee possess unique organizational knowledge? |
 |
If so, would
it be difficult to transfer that knowledge from the employee to
another? |
 |
Does that
employee have a skill set that is fairly unique within that
company? |
 |
If so, would
it be difficult to transfer those skills from the employee to
another? |
 |
Can you
pinpoint specific problem areas the employee is experiencing? |
 |
Have you
already tried general
training courses or an informal mentoring or feedback program? |
 |
Will
the employee be likely to be motivated to participate in the
coaching process? |
 |
Will
the organization agree to provide time for the employee to
participate in the coaching process? |
 |
Is
the
employee willing to work with a coach on his or her own time? |
If the answers to the above
questions were mostly YES then you have a
good candidate for executive coaching. The ASTD research study also cites, “in the case of an
ineffective executive the resultant damage can cripple or even kill an
organization’s prospects. Therefore,
any gain in executive productivity realized from executive coaching is
likely to have an extensive impact on the overall organization.”
Selecting a Coach
If you have decided to hire a coach
for your employee, the next step is selecting the coach.
Selecting the right coach for your employee is critical to the
success of the coaching effort. Trust
is the most important factor in a coaching relationship.
If your employee does not trust the coach you have selected, a
symbiotic relationship cannot occur and no progress can be made.
That is why it is advisable, if possible, to have the employee
involved from the beginning in the selection process.
Here are some criteria to consider
before selecting a coach:
 |
Degree
of trust.
The employee must trust the coach.
Any professional coach should keep all session information
confidential. This
principle in and of itself should inspire a degree of trust.
However, sometimes personality differences can prevent this
relationship from becoming open, honest two-way communication,
which can hinder the relationship.
If your employee tells you he or she is not comfortable
with the coach, this is important information and should not be
discounted. |
 |
Experience
in the field of coaching.
Ask to see references and testimonials.
Ensure the coaches’ experience extends beyond a few
years. Certification
is actually a very controversial topic in the coaching industry,
and should never be considered to replace experience. |
 |
Experience
in your particular industry.
This criterion is optional, and should mostly be considered
in cases where a coach is brought in to help with a specific
technical problem or situation.
Coaches that specialize by industry tend to come with a
heftier price tag. |
 |
Cost.
Remember you get what you pay for. There is a
reason why some coaches have fees way below the industry average,
and it often relates to their experience level or past successes.
It is worth the investment to hire a coach that falls along
the industry average or higher. |
 |
Use
of a Systematic Approach.
Almost any coach you interview is going to have a different
method for coaching. The
important part is ensuring they are using a systematic approach in
the coaching process. This
process should include an initial assessment.
If an assessment is not part of the coach’s process, the
coach should be able to produce a good reason why this is not
included. (Here is Cornelius
& Associates’ Standard One-on-One Coaching Methodology
for you to review as a sample) |
The
coaching process can be intense and expensive.
But, the improvement seen in an employee whose potential outshined their
challenges makes the coaching effort worthwhile. |